Toba Owojaiye Reporting
In a recent turn of events, the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) and the Jama’atu Nasril Islam (JNI) have expressed their strong disapproval of former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Engr. Babachir Lawal’s assertion that the All Progressives Congress (APC) is an Islamic party. This disagreement has sparked a heated controversy in Nigeria’s political landscape.
The dispute arose when Lawal claimed that Mr. Peter Obi of the Labour Party emerged victorious in the 2023 presidential election, relegating President Bola Tinubu of the APC to third place. Lawal further criticized the APC, suggesting it is now led by Muslims who make decisions in mosques. He also used derogatory language to describe certain APC leaders.
In response, the National Publicity Secretary of the APC, Mr. Felix Morka, hinted that Lawal’s remarks might be rooted in his disappointment over not being selected as President Tinubu’s running mate.
CAN has firmly rejected the practice of labeling political parties based on religious affiliations, emphasizing that this undermines inclusivity and respect for religious diversity. The organization encourages its members to make informed decisions based on individual beliefs and values. It calls for political parties and politicians to prioritize national development, good governance, and the welfare of all citizens, regardless of their religious backgrounds.
Similarly, JNI challenged Lawal to provide evidence supporting his claim that a national party with elected officials across the country has become an Islamic party. They question the basis for such a characterization, pointing out the APC’s operation in states with diverse religious demographics.
Despite the criticism, Lawal maintains his belief that the APC has transitioned into an Islamic party and that Peter Obi won the last presidential election. This controversy underscores the importance of a non-religious approach to politics and the necessity of respectful and constructive public discourse in Nigeria’s political arena.
The dispute serves as a reminder of the challenges faced in balancing religion and politics, and the significance of maintaining a secular and inclusive political environment.